It seems that editors, critics and readers look at what they read differently. This has led to a good deal of controversy about what constitutes good writing and whether point of view is even important. So what is point of view?  The way I understand it, it is what  can be known only from one person’s perspective. For instance, if  I write a scene using Jane as the character describing it, I can only use what Jane sees, hears and knows. If  I use information that only another character could know I am changing the point of view to the new character. This is one of the most difficult concepts for a writer to understand.

The powers that be (namely editors and publishers) have decided, for the most part, that any scene in a book must be told  from only one point of view. If the writer changes to the point of view of another character in that scene, or even from more than two character’s perspectives,  it is called ‘head hopping’. In other words we are ‘hopping’ from what is in one character’s head to the head of another.

Many books in the past were written from the ‘omniscient observer’ point of view. That meant that the writer, being the observer of the scene, knows what every character sees, hears and thinks and can shift to the point of view of a new character with every paragraph, if she/he wishes. Those of us who love the classics will be familiar with this.Most books used to be written in this way.

But the books that are getting the best reviews now permit  only one point of view per scene, or situation. The person describing that scene cannot change and the writer cannot tell the reader anything that person would not know.  If the point of view   changes  from scene to scene (though not within a scene), this is called multiple third person point of view, still not a favourite among the critics.

What editors and publishers appear to prefer now, is either the single third person point of view or the first person point of view. In the single third person point of view the entire story is told from the perspective of one person who is called by name, i.e. Larry did this, thought that, heard such and such. In  the first person point of view the primary character tells the entire story as ‘I’, i.e. I saw this, heard that, understand so and so. Both of these are challenging, as the writer must take care not to show or tell anything that the character would not know. They cannot, for instance, know what another character is thinking, even if it might seem obvious.  Nor can the writer have something go on behind that characters’  back. If the character cannot see it, neither must the reader. So if the writer wants the reader to understand something she/he must find a way that does not interfere with what the character telling the story could know.

Are you confused yet? That is all I will bend your minds with for today. Next time I will expand on this with some personal experiences and how they have influenced my writing. Then I will ask your opinions, both as fellow writers and as readers. Stay tuned.

 

Advertisements